Measure what matters!

    KL2017: Reporting individual sport results deserved better planning

    During the recent SEA Games I was frustrated with the difficulty of finding information about schedules, athletes, and results of the various events. The official website for the Games looked nice but offered little real information. What info was there was usually hidden in PDFs and fancy graphics. Event results, for example, were either not available at all or simply reported the gold, silver, and bronze medal winners. Data surrounding the events such as preliminary results, and full information regarding the various games and races were simply not available though some are there now in some form.

    It's unfortunate that such a large public event suffered from almost complete radio silence when it came to providing detailed information about the Games but it is not uncommon. An afternoon of research revealed that information about sport in Malaysia in general is hard to find.

    'Big Data' has become something we're used to having. We decide when to leave home for an airport pickup after checking an app on our phones. Running low on fuel? An app can direct us to the nearest petrol pump. We can Google almost anything that we can think of and get instant answers. We expect information to be available to us and presented in ways that are useful.

    In sports the need for data is no less than in any other area. This becomes evident when an event such as the SEA Games is staged. The media attention on the Games raises not only awareness and interest in the various competitions but also the expectations of the public over what and how information about the event is reported.

    Which brings us to the KL 2017 website. I was reminded of Robert Pirsig's comments in his book, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance regarding form versus substance. The information on the KL 2017 site looked good, eye candy. But information was difficult to find and when it was there it was presented in a form that was almost impossible to use.

    Look at the swimming results for a heat of the 50m freestyle for women:

    The first thing you notice on the page the image above came from is that there is no information grouping. Both heats of the women's 50m free are provided (not numbered as Heat 1 or Heat 2 by the way) but the final is somewhere else on the results page. The results are listed chronologically, as they happened, making the results page a giant mix of events and images like the one above that list every event in no manageable way. This effectively strips any meaning from the data and completely ignores that the only reason to have heats in the first place is to establish a list of finalists. The final heat of the women's 50m free should be listed with the results of the two preliminary heats if the information is to make any sense at all. Unfortunately the finals heat of the women's 50 free is somewhere else because it occurred in the evening finals session of the meet.

    The next thing you notice, which is probably the most annoying of all, is that there is no way to find the event result you might be interested in except by scrolling through image after image of individual race results. Grouping information in ways that matter and minimizing scrolling is a web standard that should never be ignored.

    The third thing you notice is the way the athletes times are presented. In the graphic above the time for the first athlete is listed as "00:00:25.7700000".

    Who writes times like that? Understanding that 'result' takes a while because you have to figure out that the athlete's time was actually 25.77. Why not simply report it that way? That's the way it came out of the timing machine. That's the way the swimming federation will report it to FINA, the international governing body for the sport. That's the way it appeared on the scoreboard at the pool. Why was there deemed to be a need to encode the time with a lot of leading and trailing zeros on the official website?

    Finally, we come to the 800m freestyle for women. Unless one understands how swimming competitions are run they might think that there were two gold medal winners in this event as shown below:

    In swimming we call this a timed final event. It's different from a preliminary/final event in that the athletes only swim the event once and results are based on times from that one swim. You'll notice that one heat was swum in the morning and the other at night, sort of like a prelim/final. But it's not.

    Ammiga, from Thailand, won the evening heat but took only second in the event overall. That's because the Vietnamese athlete, Thi Anh Vie, had a faster time from the morning heat and since the 800m freestyle is a timed final event the fastest time wins.

    This is not even mentioned on the result page however. The 800m freestyle heats are listed along with every other race result with no context provided.

    Why are the results reported this way? My guess is that whoever wrote the web pages for the results was good at designing websites but didn't know much about sport management or web usability when it came to publishing sport result information.

    Each sport needs to have its particular information published in a way that fans can understand. This means that the web developer must either understand the sport itself or realize that there already exist ways to publish information for various sports. One size does not fit all where sport results are concerned.

    It's safe to say that this one size fits all method was intended because at first the results were reported by simply listing the gold, silver, and bronze medalists in each event. While this is important information it does not meet the standard of reporting true results. Listing medalists may be 'results' in the Games context but real results include everything that happened in each sports tournament or meet and they must be presented in a way that makes sense to the sport.

    The Games aren't over yet but the sense I'm getting from watching the various competitions and reading press reports is that Malaysia has organized and is running a truly top notch event. It's exciting to see Malaysia's climbing daily medal count. But that's only part of the story of these Games. It's also important for fans to know how athletes did in their respective competitions.


    Bill Price (price@sportkid.asia) is the owner and Chief Data Scientist at Sportkid Metrics.

    DON'T FORGET TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE SPORTKID NEWSLETTER

    Don't miss any content
    Subscribe Now!

    What would you do differently if there were no such thing as talent? - 04 April 2021


    Athlete development measurements and the lingo that goes with them - 21 March 2021


    Retention and Training Age - 07 March 2021


    Fear of missing out is hurting youth sports - 23 October 2018


    Deliberate practice vs. late specialization - 24 September 2018


    Is talent identification even possible? - 17 September 2018


    Who won the Asian Games? - 10 September 2018


    Re-thinking the mission of Malaysia's sport associations - 03 September 2018


    Using maturity offsets to determine age at peak height velocity - 27 August 2018


    The youth sport talent illusion - 13 August 2018


    The tip of the iceberg - 30 July 2018


    7 things youth sport coaches should know - 25 June 2018


    Who is responsible for athlete performance - 18 June 2018


    Creating a culture of achievement in sport - 05 June 2018


    Sport development in the headlines (sort of) - 28 May 2018


    Who won the Commonwealth Games? - 23 April 2018


    Kaizen: Improving sport administration will improve performance - 02 April 2018


    What can Malaysia learn from Norway about sport development? - 05 March 2018


    Dealing with more than one email address and other communication ideas - 26 February 2018


    What can you do to work more efficiently? - 19 February 2018


    LTAD: Training to compete - 22 January 2018


    Sport clubs are the lifeblood of national sport development - 15 January 2018


    Take a chance! - 18 December 2017


    How we calculate age in youth sports can have benefits and consequences - 11 December 2017


    Can bio-banding help reduce the relative age effect in sport? - 04 December 2017


    Understanding the role that intrinsic and extrinsic motivation play in the athlete development process - 20 November 2017


    Great expectations: Expect more, get more! - 14 November 2017


    Why process is more important than outcome in a learning environment - 25 September 2017


    Sport associations are embracing physical literacy training - 18 September 2017


    Creating a true sport development system in Malaysia - 11 September 2017


    Who won the SEA Games? - 04 September 2017


    KL2017: Reporting individual sport results deserved better planning - 29 August 2017


    Can we please forget about ways to identify talent and just work on getting more athletes? - 07 August 2017


    Using the team selection process to boost motivation and increase athlete participation - 24 July 2017


    LTAD: The Train to Train stage - 10 July 2017


    LTAD: The Learn-to-Train stage - 26 June 2017


    Athletic training for youngsters - 12 June 2017


    Visualization and imagery in sports - 05 June 2017


    Young, single-sport athletes suffer more injuries and do not reach their full potential - 29 May 2017


    Transformational vs. transactional coaching - 23 May 2017


    Will they come back tomorrow? - 08 May 2017


    Advice to parents of young athletes - 01 May 2017


    Is VIP leadership of sport associations a good idea? - 22 March 2017


    What happens after an athlete's initial introduction to sport? - 27 February 2017


    "Where do athletes come from?" - 16 January 2017


    Understanding sport talent pathways - 09 January 2017


    Make 2017 the year of the growth mindset - 02 January 2017


    Teaching physical literacy skills in youth sport practices - 12 December 2016


    Developing sport from the ground up - 06 December 2016


    Pay for what you want - 21 November 2016


    The 10,000 hour rule: "Not for the faint of heart nor for the impatient" - 14 November 2016


    Parent involvement in their child's sport participation sometimes backfires - 07 November 2016


    How to do the measurements for determining peak height velocity (PHV) - 24 October 2016


    A foreign coach is not always the answer - 17 October 2016


    Tips on creating an effective coaching environment - 10 October 2016


    Peak height velocity and aerobic development - 26 September 2016


    Early sport specialization is still not a good idea - 19 September 2016


    What kind of data do we need to develop sports? - 13 September 2016


    The attrition and transformation models of sport development - 05 September 2016


    Solve for <x> - 29 August 2016


    Artificial elimination of athletes from training and competition hinders sport development in Malaysia - 15 August 2016


    Time is the most important factor in talent development - 01 August 2016


    What if opportunity never knocks? - 13 June 2016


    The long-term athlete development framework offers youngsters a chance at sport success and an active and healthy life - 06 June 2016


    Early sport specialization is not a good development strategy - 30 May 2016


    What does a declining population mean for sport? - 2 February 2016


    Coaching 'flow' - 11 November 2015


    The coach's role in creating a deliberate practice environment - 02 November 2015


    When should athletes specialize in a single sport? - 11 September 2015


    The Holy Grail of health, wellness, and sport development - 1 September 2015


    Revisiting the 10,000 hour rule - 10 August 2015


    The power of 'not yet' - 20 July 2015


    Let's stop trying to identify sport talent and start developing it - 22 June 2015