If you can measure it, you can improve it!

    Coaching 'flow'

    The concept of flow is used to describe optimal performance. Characteristics of flow include time dilation (or contraction), using psychic energy to concentrate only on the task at hand, loss of focus on self, and a feeling of oneness between the athlete, the action, and the environment in which the action occurs. In athletic events flow might happen by chance in seemingly random or unplanned activities but it is more likely that flow would occur in structured situations.

    Swim training offers a good example of how flow can occur since much of the endurance type of training in swimming consists of repetition of specific distances on an interval. For example, a training set might consist of 10 x 200 on 3:15 ("ten times two hundred meters leaving every 3 minutes and 15 seconds"). The amount of rest the athlete gets between efforts is determined by how fast they swim each 200 m distance.

    If the athlete's skills match the requirements of the training set then an achievable challenge has been created and it is possible to achieve a flow state during the set. If the athlete's skills are such that the interval is not challenging or the opposite, that the athlete can't possibly cover 200 meters even once in 3:15 then the flow state cannot be achieved and something has to be adjusted. Either the distance has to be made shorter or the interval increased. For flow to occur the activity must challenge the athlete's ability but not so much that success is unlikely.

    Enough psychic energy needs to be used to accomplish the training set in order to prevent other distractions from interfering. Here the level of the challenge also plays a role. Sets that are too easy or too difficult will not engage the athlete enough to devote psychic energy to accomplishing it. If the set is too easy then psychic energy will be used to concentrate on other things; too hard and no concentration on the set will occur at all.

    A well designed training must meet the following criteria:

    1. It is designed to that desired training effects are actually reached.
    2. It presents an achievable challenge to the athlete.
    3. The set encourages the athlete to focus attention on the task.

    Creating a flow environment

    It is one thing to understand the concept of flow but quite another for coaches to be able to implement training and practice strategies that encourage flow states in their athletes. Flow is a psychological state and consists of nine components:

    1. Balancing challenge and skills
    2. Merging action and awareness
    3. Having clear goals
    4. Receiving unambiguous feedback
    5. Concentrating on the task
    6. Having a sense of control
    7. Losing self-consciousness
    8. Feeling a transformation of time
    9. Being rewarded simply by performing the activity (autotelic experience)

    Coaches must create an environment where these components work together. Based on the nature of some of the components coaches may not be able to affect all of them and should focus on those they have direct control over. The athlete's role cannot be discounted. The old saying "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink," applies to any training environment. Coaches can structure the environment so that flow becomes possible but they can't create it directly, that's up to the athlete.

    As Jackson and Csikszentmihalyi noted in their 1999 book Flow in Sports, the flow experience "offers a state of being that is so rewarding one does it for no other reason than to be a part of it." It's easy to see why athletes would seek to repeat flow experiences. Since liking an activity enough to repeat it frequently is essential to becoming better at it coaches naturally have an interest in creating environments where these experiences exist. At the youth level especially, a coach is able to shape the practice environment so young athletes will look forward to their sport experiences.

    The good news is that sport provides flow experiences almost half the time while other less physical activities provide far fewer opportunities to experience flow. So whether the activity is based on individual or team participation the most important part of the flow equation may simply lie in making it fun. But manipulating flow components varies a bit between team and individual sports.

    Individual sport

    A swimming coach could create a flow environment when teaching technique by having the athlete focus on specific parts of the technique. Counting strokes per length is a tool for developing efficiency: The fewer strokes an athlete takes the more efficient the stroke becomes. Focusing only on this, however, leads to very efficient but slow swimming since it's easy to exaggerate the stroke so much that the athlete moves slower and slower as the number of strokes decreases.

    The coach knows that efficiency is only part of effective technique so a quick 'flow fix' would be to have the athlete continue to count strokes per length but also focus on hitting a certain time in each effort. This requires a broad internal awareness of stroke length and rate, and maintaining a steady streamlined kick during each effort. At the end of each effort the athlete checks the time to see if the prescribed goal has been reached. The athlete has several options on each effort that will keep keep their mind on task, changing stroke rate or length, and kicking faster can be combined in different combinations. The challenge is hitting the right time with the lowest stroke count on each effort and since the variables are independent of the student's skills they already have the requisite skill level.

    Though only a very basic example, this kind of set illustrates how mental and physical focus can be achieved. Almost any level of swimmer would be able to use the variables and achieve some measure of success. Paying attention to the variables would help create a flow environment because the athlete would have to be focused on what he was doing to achieve success.

    Team sport

    Creating flow experiences in team activities is different because multiple team members are involved in most activities. Practicing individual skills in a training session resembles individual sport more than a team activity since individual efforts are the focus of such activity. Coaches can design flow experiences into team activities though by emphasizing the merging of action and awareness, identifying clear goals, and providing unambiguous feedback.

    Simulation training can be used to create a flow environment in team activity. The simulation resembles the actual competitive environment that athletes will play in, much like a dress rehearsal. After the athletes have learned the skills involved in the activity (usually a play or series of plays) the simulation allows the skills to be practiced as a whole. An effective simulation will allow the plays to be repeated enough so that athletes will be able to perform them without anxiety. Simulation also helps remove the competitive novelty from actual competition environments.

    Practicing the plays as a team allows players to merge their actions with an awareness of how those actions are important to the overall strategy, which includes the other players, where they are on the field, and how their actions affect those of the other players.

    Coaches who create flow experiences in practice situations will have better practices because athletes will want to be there more often. This addresses two problems found at the youth sport level i.e. attitude towards practice and frequency of practice. Understanding how to manipulate the components of flow to create better experiences for young athletes could result in fewer athletes dropping out of sport, a goal that both coaches and national sport organizations can embrace.

    Bill Price (price@sportkid.asia) is the owner and Chief Data Scientist at Sportkid Metrics.


    Don't miss any content
    Subscribe Now!

    What would you do differently if there were no such thing as talent? - 04 April 2021

    Athlete development measurements and the lingo that goes with them - 21 March 2021

    Retention and Training Age - 07 March 2021

    Fear of missing out is hurting youth sports - 23 October 2018

    Deliberate practice vs. late specialization - 24 September 2018

    Is talent identification even possible? - 17 September 2018

    Who won the Asian Games? - 10 September 2018

    Re-thinking the mission of Malaysia's sport associations - 03 September 2018

    Using maturity offsets to determine age at peak height velocity - 27 August 2018

    The youth sport talent illusion - 13 August 2018

    The tip of the iceberg - 30 July 2018

    7 things youth sport coaches should know - 25 June 2018

    Who is responsible for athlete performance - 18 June 2018

    Creating a culture of achievement in sport - 05 June 2018

    Sport development in the headlines (sort of) - 28 May 2018

    Who won the Commonwealth Games? - 23 April 2018

    Kaizen: Improving sport administration will improve performance - 02 April 2018

    What can Malaysia learn from Norway about sport development? - 05 March 2018

    Dealing with more than one email address and other communication ideas - 26 February 2018

    What can you do to work more efficiently? - 19 February 2018

    LTAD: Training to compete - 22 January 2018

    Sport clubs are the lifeblood of national sport development - 15 January 2018

    Take a chance! - 18 December 2017

    How we calculate age in youth sports can have benefits and consequences - 11 December 2017

    Can bio-banding help reduce the relative age effect in sport? - 04 December 2017

    Understanding the role that intrinsic and extrinsic motivation play in the athlete development process - 20 November 2017

    Great expectations: Expect more, get more! - 14 November 2017

    Why process is more important than outcome in a learning environment - 25 September 2017

    Sport associations are embracing physical literacy training - 18 September 2017

    Creating a true sport development system in Malaysia - 11 September 2017

    Who won the SEA Games? - 04 September 2017

    KL2017: Reporting individual sport results deserved better planning - 29 August 2017

    Can we please forget about ways to identify talent and just work on getting more athletes? - 07 August 2017

    Using the team selection process to boost motivation and increase athlete participation - 24 July 2017

    LTAD: The Train to Train stage - 10 July 2017

    LTAD: The Learn-to-Train stage - 26 June 2017

    Athletic training for youngsters - 12 June 2017

    Visualization and imagery in sports - 05 June 2017

    Young, single-sport athletes suffer more injuries and do not reach their full potential - 29 May 2017

    Transformational vs. transactional coaching - 23 May 2017

    Will they come back tomorrow? - 08 May 2017

    Advice to parents of young athletes - 01 May 2017

    Is VIP leadership of sport associations a good idea? - 22 March 2017

    What happens after an athlete's initial introduction to sport? - 27 February 2017

    "Where do athletes come from?" - 16 January 2017

    Understanding sport talent pathways - 09 January 2017

    Make 2017 the year of the growth mindset - 02 January 2017

    Teaching physical literacy skills in youth sport practices - 12 December 2016

    Developing sport from the ground up - 06 December 2016

    Pay for what you want - 21 November 2016

    The 10,000 hour rule: "Not for the faint of heart nor for the impatient" - 14 November 2016

    Parent involvement in their child's sport participation sometimes backfires - 07 November 2016

    How to do the measurements for determining peak height velocity (PHV) - 24 October 2016

    A foreign coach is not always the answer - 17 October 2016

    Tips on creating an effective coaching environment - 10 October 2016

    Peak height velocity and aerobic development - 26 September 2016

    Early sport specialization is still not a good idea - 19 September 2016

    What kind of data do we need to develop sports? - 13 September 2016

    The attrition and transformation models of sport development - 05 September 2016

    Solve for <x> - 29 August 2016

    Artificial elimination of athletes from training and competition hinders sport development in Malaysia - 15 August 2016

    Time is the most important factor in talent development - 01 August 2016

    What if opportunity never knocks? - 13 June 2016

    The long-term athlete development framework offers youngsters a chance at sport success and an active and healthy life - 06 June 2016

    Early sport specialization is not a good development strategy - 30 May 2016

    What does a declining population mean for sport? - 2 February 2016

    Coaching 'flow' - 11 November 2015

    The coach's role in creating a deliberate practice environment - 02 November 2015

    When should athletes specialize in a single sport? - 11 September 2015

    The Holy Grail of health, wellness, and sport development - 1 September 2015

    Revisiting the 10,000 hour rule - 10 August 2015

    The power of 'not yet' - 20 July 2015

    Let's stop trying to identify sport talent and start developing it - 22 June 2015